SPECIAL REPORT: FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HIRING OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES THROUGH THE SCHEDULE A HIRING AUTHORITY
Statement
The federal government’s Schedule A program intended to facilitate the hiring of people with disabilities is severely underutilized, especially in hiring people with cognitive and psychiatric disabilities.
Background
The Office of Personnel Management created the Schedule A program more than 20 years ago to allow for greater recruitment and hiring of individuals with disabilities. It allows federal agencies to bypass the competitive process to provide disabled individuals a unique opportunity to demonstrate their ability to successfully perform the essential duties of a position with or without reasonable accommodation. OPM states that the Schedule A certification is used to "appoint persons who are certified that they are at a severe disadvantage in obtaining employment…Certification also ensures that they are capable of functioning in the position for which they will be appointed, and that any residual disabilities are not job-related."
Reasons for Study
In order for the federal government to have an adequately diverse workforce, agencies should hire people from all segments of society, including those with all disabilities. People with disabilities are not only inadequately represented in the federal government, but government agencies are not implementing the programs that have been created to help decrease this disparity.
The Schedule A program, specifically developed to help reduce the more than 70% unemployment rate of people with disabilities – people who want to work and are more than capable of working – has been severely underutilized and virtually ignored by most government agencies. Even years after the federal government was notified of the lack of progress in hiring people with disabilities through the Schedule A hiring authority, the government continues to show a reckless disregard for this issue. There has been no recent increase in the number of such individuals hired.
Summary of Results
I submitted Freedom of Information Act requests to federal government agencies asking how many times the Schedule A certification was used to hire people with disabilities in the three categories defined by OPM as: physical disability, mental retardation, and psychiatric disability. I changed the title in my table for the second category from mental retardation to cognitive disability to include those hires listed who had cognitive disabilities but did not necessarily meet the threshold of mental retardation.
The table below shows the number of times federal government agencies hired people with disabilities using the Schedule A hiring authority for the years specified, based on the information provided by agencies. Different agencies provided different timeframes so the data is not consistent across all agencies. However, the ratios of hires from different categories are fairly consistent.
Most federal agencies underutilized the Schedule A program or did not use it at all. In almost all cases in which the hiring authority was used, hires of people with physical disabilities outnumbered those with cognitive disabilities and psychiatric disabilities by an extremely wide margin. Noteworthy results from the survey include the following:
Several agencies did in fact hire a significant number of employees in either the cognitive or psychiatric disability categories.
It is important to note that there are people working in the federal government with disabilities who were hired without using the Schedule A certification.
Recommendations
Federal agencies should not only develop policy on making the hiring process as inclusive as possible, but should also be accountable to those claims by ensuring that the policies are effectively implemented in a way that will mutually benefit the agencies, the public whom they represent and work for, and the employees who conduct work for these agencies. The federal government should recruit more people with disabilities into their workforce by utilizing the Schedule A hiring authority. Congress should enact laws to ensure that the federal government’s workforce is representative of society as a whole. Finally, categories of disabilities should be reworked to ensure that people with all disabilities are included.
Specific recommendations include:
1. The federal government should increase recruitment of job candidates with disabilities.
The federal government should recruit more people with disabilities, especially those with cognitive, developmental, and psychiatric disabilities. According to the data provided by federal agencies, the total number of Schedule A hires was as follows: 4069 hires with physical disabilities (73% of all Schedule A hires with disabilities), 124 hires with cognitive disabilities (2% of all Schedule A hires with disabilities), and 229 hires with psychiatric disabilities (4% of all Schedule A hires with disabilities). The remaining 21% were unspecified. Counting statistics from all agencies except the Department of the Navy and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Schedule A hires of people with psychiatric disabilities accounted for just 1% of all people hired with disabilities through Schedule A.
Based on the data, the federal government seems to give preference to people with physical disabilities over those with other disabilities, and may discriminate against those with other disabilities, if a lack of recruitment can be considered discrimination. The scarcity of Schedule A hires in the cognitive and psychiatric categories is staggering, disappointing, and shameful. People with cognitive disabilities can perform certain jobs very effectively and people with psychiatric disabilities often have a very high intellect. As with people with developmental disabilities, these potential employees may simply require reasonable accommodations. Agencies should empower Special Placement Coordinators with more authority to recruit and hire people with disabilities. Although the OPM website states that this is currently the case, in fact, they often do not have the leeway or the incentive to do so.
2. The federal government should revise classifications of disabilities to include those with developmental disabilities.
The federal government should change the current classifications to include developmental disabilities. This would include people on the autism spectrum. In the hundreds of pages of responses I received from government agencies, not once was there a mention of someone hired who had autism. While there must have been cases in which autistic people have been hired using the Schedule A certification or otherwise, in the descriptions of the types of disabilities listed by federal agencies in their FOIA responses, the term "autism" never came up, though some agencies did not go into detail other than listing the three major categories.
The categorization of disabilities under the Schedule A program seems to exclude most people on the autism spectrum. The Schedule A Program lists people with disabilities in three broad categories. The first category, "severe physical disability," would only sometimes apply to a person with autism. The second category, "mental retardation," may apply to a percentage of people on the autism spectrum, but it is now believed by many experts that far fewer people with autism than previously believed have mental retardation, a term, which incidentally, is being phased out in favor of "intellectual disability" or "cognitive disability." Finally, the third category, "psychiatric disability" does not cover those with autism, which should be classified as a "developmental disability," a term that would be much more accurate and inclusive.
Regarding psychiatric disabilities, it is important to note that the federal government states that this third category is only for "hiring people who have recovered from mental illness." Unfortunately, most mental illnesses are chronic, so this wording discriminates against those who retain a diagnosis of a mental illness or psychiatric disability. People with psychiatric disabilities should be given a fair chance to work and contribute to the missions of federal agencies rather than being explicitly discriminated against through government policies.
The federal government should also not restrict employment of those on the autism spectrum to those who have "recovered," because while some people on the spectrum make remarkable progress and some eventually become indistinguishable from the general population, most people with autism do not become completely "recovered."
3. Congress should pass laws that require agencies to hire people with disabilities.
Congress should pass laws that require agencies to hire people with disabilities or provide incentives for doing so. Those with psychiatric, cognitive, or developmental disabilities should be adequately represented. For the past 20 years, the Schedule A program has been severely underutilized and often ignored by many agencies. The vast majority of Schedule A hires have come from the physical disability category. It has been proven that most agencies will not do what is right in this area; they will only do what they are required to do. Therefore strong laws need to be enacted. Unfortunately, lobbyist groups for disabled people do not exist in the way that they do for high-powered, money-making special interest groups such as the oil and pharmaceutical industries. Still, lawmakers should pass laws that will facilitate the hiring of people with disabilities because the costs of not doing so in the long term are certainly more than the short term costs. Legislation requiring the federal government ensure that people with various disabilities are adequately represented will help prevent institutional, systematic discrimination against people with disabilities. People with disabilities face enough problems without being discriminated against.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the federal agency FOIA representatives who responded to my requests for information.
| Federal Government Hiring of People with Disabilities through the Schedule A Hiring Authority | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employees with Disabilities Hired through the Schedule A Program |
|||||
Agency |
Years Reported |
Physical Disability |
Cognitive Disability |
Psychiatric Disability |
Other Disability or Not Specified |
No response from parent agency; only some of its sub-agencies responded. |
|||||
|
|
16 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2007 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
1991-2008 |
816 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
29 |
9 |
0 |
9 |
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
|
2003-2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
1998-2007 |
36 |
5 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
2003-2008 |
35 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
9 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
No response from parent agency; only sub-agencies responded. |
|||||
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
|||||
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
2001-2008 |
16 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
2004-2008 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
2005-2007 |
75 |
9 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
2001-2007 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
2001-2005 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
||||
| Referred request to the Navy. |
|||||
| No response or refused to provide information | |||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
2002-2007 |
221 |
5 |
148 |
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
| No response or refused to provide information. | |||||
1998-2008 |
58 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2007 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
198 |
15 |
1 |
|
|
|
2000-2008 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
43 |
0 |
0 |
|
2000-2008 |
31 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
62 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
2000-2008 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
|
1998-2008 |
21 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
2000-2008 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
15 |
7 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2008 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
2003-2008 |
81 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
2003-2008 |
29 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
17 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
2003-2008 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
2003-2008 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
2003-2008 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
2005-2007 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Includes all current employees |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
2003-2008 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
2003-2008 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
2003-2008 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
2003-2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2005-2007 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Includes all current employees |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Department of Justice |
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
Did not receive FOIA request. |
|||||
2000-2006 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
No response from parent agency; only some of its sub-agencies responded. |
|||||
1992-2008 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
2003-2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Submitted a bar graph rather than actual data. It appears that the Department of Veterans Affairs hired a significant number of employees with disabilities, including psychiatric disabilities, through the Schedule A program. |
|||||
Other Federal Agencies |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
1989-2008 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Committee for Purchase from People who Are Blind or Severely Disabled |
1993-2008 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
1974-2008 |
84 |
14 |
2 |
25 |
|
2003-2007 |
2296 |
unknown |
66 |
1058 (indicated as “handicap”) |
|
Executive Office of the President |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2000-2007 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
1993-2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1989-2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation | No response or refused to provide information.
|
||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
| Federal Maritime Commission |
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
1988-2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Division of Monetary Affairs |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
1998-2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
1993-1997 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
1985-2004 |
36 |
46 |
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
2002-2008 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2002-2007 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
|
2004-2008 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
2001-2007 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
1993-2008 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
No response or refused to provide information. |
||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
No response or refused to provide information. |
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No response or refused to provide information.
|
|||||
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Totals |
|
4069 (73%) |
124 (2%) |
229 (4%) |
1165 (21%) |
Totals excluding Navy and EEOC |
|
1552 (87%) |
119 (7%) |
15 (1%) |
107 (6%) |